https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036254 --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #2) > Hi Antonio, > > Thank you for the review! Hi Ankur. > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > > - The '/usr/share/appdata' and '/usr/share/gnome/help' directories are not > > owned. > > They are co-owned by some "no-core" packages. I think both directories can be > > owned even by this package. > > I'll update this. > > I can't find what package owns /usr/share/gnome/help at all: > > [asinha@ankur-laptop ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/gnome/help/ > file /usr/share/gnome/help is not owned by any package > > Each package owns it's directory, but no one owns this? Probably a packaging > bug somewhere. Probably because those packages are not installed on your Fedora. Try "repoquery -f /usr/share/gnome/help" or "yum provides /usr/share/gnome/help". Please, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function > > > > > - 'non-conffile-in-etc' warnings should be fixed > > I'll look into this. The gconf schema doesn't need to be marked as %config > from the looks of it since they aren't configuration files that a user can > manually edit. > > Same for the bash completion directory. It isn't marked as a config > directory: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bash-completion.git/tree/bash-completion. > spec It's marked here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnome-do.git/tree/gnome-do.spec :) > > > > ><snip> > > > > Issues: > > ======= > > - GConf schemas are properly installed > > Note: gconf file(s) in hamster-time-tracker > > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GConf > > ^ Are they properly installed, or improperly installed? I mean, is the way > I've handled it wrong? I did get all those scriptlets from the wiki page > itself. They are properly installed although guide-lines say "For packaging purposes, we have to disable schema installation during build, ..." and this happens during './waf install ..' tasks. However, I don't know for particular guide-lines of "waf" and it's necessary ask in devel ML. > > > - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel > > The package doesn't contain this. Does this need to be added? Oh, yes. Sorry, I had not noted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review