https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036254 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Antonio, Thank you for the review! (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > - The '/usr/share/appdata' and '/usr/share/gnome/help' directories are not > owned. > They are co-owned by some "no-core" packages. I think both directories can be > owned even by this package. I'll update this. I can't find what package owns /usr/share/gnome/help at all: [asinha@ankur-laptop ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/gnome/help/ file /usr/share/gnome/help is not owned by any package Each package owns it's directory, but no one owns this? Probably a packaging bug somewhere. > > - 'non-conffile-in-etc' warnings should be fixed I'll look into this. The gconf schema doesn't need to be marked as %config from the looks of it since they aren't configuration files that a user can manually edit. Same for the bash completion directiory. It isn't marked as a config directory: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bash-completion.git/tree/bash-completion.spec > ><snip> > > Issues: > ======= > - GConf schemas are properly installed > Note: gconf file(s) in hamster-time-tracker > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GConf ^ Are they properly installed, or improperly installed? I mean, is the way I've handled it wrong? I did get all those scriptlets from the wiki page itself. > - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel The package doesn't contain this. Does this need to be added? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review