https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292 --- Comment #26 from Cott Lang <cott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- src rpm works flawlessly for me, as does s3fs-fuse. Thanks, Jorge! However, I think having the binary named s3fs-fuse is going to confuse people, since it will conflict with the documentation online as well as the man page itself. If removing the other package isn't palatable, can we stick with the original binary name of s3fs and make this package conflict with the original s3fs package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review