https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029142 --- Comment #16 from Will Benton <willb@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I'll note for the record that the existing guidelines do not address this issue — in which source tags are used essentially to provide substantial, downstream-specific patches — explicitly. If these sources were instead formulated as patches, they could live in distgit without issue. But since there is some benefit to specifying URLs for these pieces, and since there is a canonical location for them (both now and in the future), there is essentially no downside to specifying URLs in these cases. (As an example, note that thrift's package uses source URLs for downstream-specific components including the manpage, which was contributed by Debian packagers for the Debian thrift package, and POM files, which are from Maven Central.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review