https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717 --- Comment #33 from Dennis van Dok <dennisvd@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #32) > The libdl dep should be handled like other library dep - a true/false macro > should be added to the AC_CHECK_LIB() call (see the call for crypto a little > below) to set a DL_LIBS variable which would only be added to those link > lines that need it. The next release will address this issue. > Although I'm not seeing any more unused lib dep rpmlint > messages myself on F20, so I'm not sure it is necessary. Perhaps the --as-needed did the trick after all? I'm running fedora-review on f19, I'm not sure I should expect the same results. > FWIW - If you still want to target EPEL5, you'll need BuildRoot and %clean. > If not, I would drop the conditionals for %{rhel}<=5. Yes, we do aim for EPEL5. So I'll fix this. > Finally - are you *sure* you want to keep the -devel packages as noarch? No, are the -devel packages noarch now? The only thing I see is that they have a requires on some packages without %{?_isa}; is that harmful? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review