https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714 --- Comment #17 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package APPROVED wrt lpf-skype.spec file. Now to the bundled skype.spec file. I used to mantain the same for a few years; would you like to take a look at: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/skype.spec Apart from stylistical differences in the SPEC file and description/summaries the things I notice most are the following: - Fedora 20+ needs a wrapper because it needs PULSE_LATENCY_MSEC=30; setting it in a profile under /etc/profile.d does not work. - Requires webkitgtk%{_isa}; is not pulled automatically in by dependencies and it's needed for the first html based welcome screen, otherwise if it's not already configured, there's no way to configure it for the first time. - ExclusiveArch should be i686 (RPMFusion style) or %{ix86}; x86_64 is not supported. - You are missing a prelink configuration file. If you run it for a day, after prelink has run on any EPEL or Fedora system, the program gets corrupted and you need to reinstall the rpm. Prelink it's disabled in Fedora 21+, (iirc). - I avoid stripping by using "%define __spec_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress" at the top of the spec file, don't know what the impact is compared to your solution. I've also added you in CC to my (obsolete, probably) Skype review in RPMFusion; just for reference. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review