https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979767 --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #13) > What Christopher fails to mention is that the "hicolor-icon-theme" is a > "-filesystem" type of package. It only contains the basic structure for the > hicolor icon theme tree, i.e. no icons but just directories, documentation, > and a few support files. > > That's covered in the yellow box here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your > _package_to_function I did read that part. I didn't realize hicolor-icon-theme was a filesystem type package. > > As such, it is preferred if you "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" to get right > the ownership for those many dirs. The alternative would not be pretty: I've added this to the spec. > > > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/%{name}.* > > Isn't sufficient. At least these would not be included: > > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/* > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps Thanks for the clarification Michael. Warm regards, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review