https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057 --- Comment #4 from Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@xxxxxxxxxx> --- %changelog * Sat Oct 12 2013 Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@xxxxxxxxxx> 0-0.2.hg61664b8425f3 - compiler plugin in archful base package - libraries in noarch (except rhel6) devel subpackage Spec URL: http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/golang-googlecode-goprotobuf.spec SRPM URL: http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.2.hg61664b8425f3.fc21.src.rpm $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.2.hg61664b8425f3.fc21.x86_64.rpm golang-googlecode-goprotobuf.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/protoc-gen-go golang-googlecode-goprotobuf.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/protoc-gen-go golang-googlecode-goprotobuf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary protoc-gen-go 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Note: 1. Should the docs go with base package or devel subpackage? (currently going with base) 2. with base package:- Requires: protobuf (not entirely sure) 3. Installing only the binary and not the .a archives (for now) 4. Current location of protoc-gen-go binary is /usr/bin, but README suggests $GOPATH/bin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review