https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007577 Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #5 from Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #4) > > d) arprec-config contains arch-specific settings > > This issue persists: > > diff -Naur x86_64/usr/bin/arprec-config i386/usr/bin/arprec-config > --- x86_64/usr/bin/arprec-config 2013-09-13 09:34:38.000000000 +0200 > +++ i386/usr/bin/arprec-config 2013-09-13 09:45:30.000000000 +0200 > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > prefix="/usr" > exec_prefix="/usr" > includedir="/usr/include" > -libdir="/usr/lib64" > +libdir="/usr/lib" > bindir="/usr/bin" > datadir="${prefix}/share" > mandir="/usr/share/man" > @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ > LIBS="-L$libdir -larprec " > > FC="f95" > -FCLIBS="-L$libdir -larprecmod -larprec > -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.1 -L/usr/lib/ > +FCLIBS="-L$libdir -larprecmod -larprec > -L/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.8.1 -L/usr/lib/gc > FCFLAGS="" > MODINC="-I $includedir/arprec" > FMAINLIB="-L$libdir -larprec_f_main" > > -configure_args=" '--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' > '--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--progra > +configure_args=" '--build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu' > '--host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu' '--program-pr > usage() > { > cat <<EOF > > => My remark from comment#2 is still valid. > You'd see rpm installation conflicts when installing > *-devel.i386 and *-devel.x86_64 in parallel (This is a multilib problem!). This should be fixed now by using modified arprec-config wrapper && pkg-config. > > el5: no el5 build for this. autotools are too dated. > No idea, why you writing saying this. Right, it fails to build on epel5, > however not due to the autotools, but for rpm-incompatibilities: > ... > error: Group field must be present in package: (main package) > ... I've added the needed bits for el5, but during %build you can see %configure throws warnings about too dated autotools' stuff. Testsuite seems to pass, so I don't expect problems with el5 now. ##### Update: %changelog: * Fri Sep 13 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.2.16-3 - added needed bits for el5 - created an ascii-txt license from the license.doc provided by upstream - nuked rpath from %%{_bindir}/%{name}-math* - added .pc-file to solve the multiarch-problematic and aged %%{name}-config - run `autoupdate` and `autoreconf -fiv` to fixup obsolete autotools-macros for el6+ * Fri Sep 13 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.2.16-2 - renamed tools-common pkg to data - merged common-devel pkg with devel, because it can't be noarch - removed calling autoreconf during %%build - some minor improvements in %%prep, mostly comments - as suggested in rhbz# 1007577 c#2 * Thu Sep 12 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.2.16-1 - Initial rpm release (#1007577) Koji Builds: el5: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5930762 el6: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5930766 F18: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5930770 F19: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5930773 F20: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5930777 Frh: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5930782 Urls: Spec URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/arprec.spec SRPM URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/arprec-2.2.16-3.fc21.src.rpm ##### This update should solve all issues found so far. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6k5vuNLIky&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review