https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003094 Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx | |m --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- The tarball contains a bundled egg-info which has to be removed for building the package: rm -rf %{namewithoutpythonprefix}.egg-info See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Upstream_Eggs for more information. PKG-INFO shouldn't be added to %doc. It is present from the egg-info anyway. Its content is similar to README and doesn't provide any additional info. %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT The initial cleaning of buildroot is no longer needed because it is default anyway. It is only needed (probably...?) for EPEL5 packages. %{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/templates/* %{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/*.py* %{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/writers/*.py* The folders %{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/templates/ and %{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/writers/ stay unowned. Actually it should be sufficient to just write %{python_sitelib}/%{namewithoutpythonprefix}/* to own the whole folder, its subfolders and the content. Summary: Python module for... The package name already says that it is a Python module, you might write instead: Summary: Converting IETF RFC-2629 XML into txt What about to run the tests in ./tests in a %check section? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pHLW2CleyB&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review