https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871205 Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #4 from Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Mario, The build type is set to none because CMake's default build flags for release and relwithdebinfo aren't that useful: they just duplicate some of Fedora's optflags. Upstream doesn't set any custom build flags at the moment, but I'll go ahead and switch it to RelWithDebInfo anyway. I've submitted a ticket upstream[1] asking about adding library versioning. In the meantime, I've got an update to 0.2.8 here: Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/urdfdom/urdfdom.spec SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/urdfdom/urdfdom-0.2.8-1.fc19.src.rpm It requires urdfdom-headers-0.2.3, which I've just built and submitted for f19, f18 and el6 (it's also built in rawhide). $ rpmlint ./urdfdom.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/urdfdom-* urdfdom.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/liburdfdom_sensor.so liburdfdom_sensor.so urdfdom.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/liburdfdom_world.so liburdfdom_world.so urdfdom.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/liburdfdom_model_state.so liburdfdom_model_state.so urdfdom.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/liburdfdom_model.so liburdfdom_model.so urdfdom.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary check_urdf urdfdom.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary urdf_mem_test urdfdom.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary urdf_to_graphiz urdfdom-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 4 warnings. [1] https://github.com/ros/urdfdom/issues/6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y5BGvkLcUz&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review