Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-18 08:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > Well, for -12: > > * Again check the license: > * ./lib/form/license.term > - What does the following paragraph mean? > ------------------------------------------------------ > RESTRICTED RIGHTS: Use, duplication or disclosure by the government > is subject to the restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) > of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software Clause as DFARS > 252.227-7013 and FAR 52.227-19. Hmm, dunno. Indeed in same file thay make clear statement thats public domain, dont know why they instert restricts for governmental use ?! > ------------------------------------------------------ > This term is related to the files under ./visualization/nviz/ > ------------------------------------------------------ > * See the file "license.terms" for information on usage and redistribution > * of this file, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES. > ------------------------------------------------------ > * Files under ./raster/r.out.mpeg/ > - Are these related to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/MP3 ? Its just a wrapper, i think its safe. It calls external cli tools like pnmtompeg from netpnm: http://netpbm.sourceforge.net/doc/index.html Indeed, fedora netpnm does not contain the mpeg parts :-) > * Files under ./raster/r.terraflow/ > - It seems that these are licensed under _old_ BSD (i.e. > with advertising clause). > ------------------------------------------------------ > * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software > * must display the following acknowledgement: > * This product includes software developed by Duke University > ------------------------------------------------------ Duke developed many software, thay just want to promote themself by asking in cases of expos or whatever publications to mention their names. Is it completely unacceptable ? > * Compilation flags > - "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" is passed. oh .. i go fix it again. > ------------------------------------------------------ > make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/grass-6.2.1/lib/datetime' > gcc -I/builddir/build/BUILD/grass-6.2.1/dist.i686-redhat-linux-gnu/include -O2 > -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -DPACKAGE=\""grasslibs"\" > -DPACKAGE=\""grasslibs"\" > -I/builddir/build/BUILD/grass-6.2.1/dist.i686-redhat-linux-gnu/include \ > -o OBJ.i686-redhat-linux-gnu/between.o -c between.c > ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review