[Bug 232703] Review Request: perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2 - Write bzip2 files/buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2 - Write bzip2 files/buffers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232703





------- Additional Comments From andreas@xxxxxxxxx  2007-03-18 08:11 EST -------
+ source files match upstream:    5ddb54bf0f91187786952cfbcf66cd00 
IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.004.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
+ license is "GPL or Artistic".
+ latest version is being packaged.
- BuildRequires are somewhat proper. perl(IO::Compress::Base) is however not
available.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
o noarch package. $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not necessary.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installs properly
o noarch package. no debuginfo package is being generated.
+ rpmlint is silent.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
== provides
perl(IO::Compress::Adapter::Bzip2) = 2.004
perl(IO::Compress::Bzip2) = 2.004
perl(IO::Uncompress::Adapter::Bunzip2) = 2.004
perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2) = 2.004
perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2 = 2.004-1.fc7
== requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(Compress::Raw::Bzip2) >= 2.004
perl(Exporter)
perl(IO::Compress::Adapter::Bzip2) >= 2.004
perl(IO::Compress::Base) >= 2.004
perl(IO::Compress::Base::Common) >= 2.004
perl(IO::Uncompress::Adapter::Bunzip2) >= 2.004
perl(IO::Uncompress::Base) >= 2.004
perl(bytes)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
- %check is present and all supported tests pass. However, Test::POD would be
useful as a BR
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ no duplication of system libraries.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.

The package looks okay and I'd approve it. Unfortunately, it does not build in
mock as of right now.
As soon as perl(IO::Compress::Base) 2.004 or higher is available I'll approve
that package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]