https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993456 --- Comment #5 from Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for taking a look. Updated packages: Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/metslib/metslib.spec SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/metslib/metslib-0.5.3-2.fc19.src.rpm I submitted a bug report upstream asking for clarification of the abstract_search.hh license: https://projects.coin-or.org/metslib/ticket/3 I will also ask about including a copy of the license text. As far as the BuildArch: goes, we ran into the same sort of issue with the eigen3 package recently. It is good to be able to run the unit tests on all architectures, but there isn't a need to have arch specific packages. We ended up doing what you suggested: only marking the -devel package as noarch, so that all builders will run the unit tests, and disabling the debuginfo generation since there are no binaries to strip. I did the same to this package. I provided %{name} = %{version}-%{release} more for convenience at install-time rather than for packaging purposes. I agree it's not really necessary though so I removed it. The -O3 and .la removal have been fixed. I also removed all references to the libdir from the pkgconfig file (they're not necessary.) $ rpmlint metslib.spec ../RPMS/noarch/metslib-devel-0.5.3-2.fc19.noarch.rpm metslib-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metaheuristic -> Meta heuristic, Meta-heuristic, Heuristics metslib-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metaheuristic -> meta heuristic, meta-heuristic, heuristics 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=crFE9auJcX&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review