https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990932 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> --- Sorry, submitted too fast. (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > erlang-riaknostic.src: W: invalid-url Source0: > basho-riaknostic-v1.1.0-0-g8cfb08e.tar.gz → You can use github link like > https://github.com/basho/riaknostic/archive/v1.1.0.tar.gz, which should give > the same file. Fixed. > Also, there's a new upstream release v1.2.0. Yes, I'm aware of this. But I can't use 1.2.0 until I upgrade to Riak 1.4.x (I plan to update in Fedora 21). > Is the package really usable without riak-admin? The documentation mentions > that it can be run standalone for testing purposes... I don't know almost > anything about riak, so I'm guessing here, but I think that it should have > Requires:riak. It's not a standalone package - it's a library. README doesn't properly describes that. riak-admin is the script from riak package which could use riaknostic if this library is available. So it's riak who is dependent upon riaknostic, not the opposite. > Also, maybe the description could be updated to say "is a plugin for > riak-admin" instead of "is integrated with ...", just to be more direct. Yes, definitely! New package: * http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-riaknostic.spec * http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-riaknostic-1.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2) > Should we add VCS tag? I think rpm doesn't support checkout from git and > install, not sure if we need that. I added this mostly for the reference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Aa4pODGNa3&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review