https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> --- 1. If I don't mark it as %config I'm afraid rpmlint will shout. But it's right to not mark them as they are not conf files. I remember someone has marked it as %config, or maybe I forget, whatever. 2. Fixed. For issue 3, you can review my spec again: Spec URL: http://cicku.me/dput.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/dput-0.9.6.4-2.fc20.src.rpm Not sure if you are packager now, if you get approved later, please continue. --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> --- 1. If I don't mark it as %config I'm afraid rpmlint will shout. But it's right to not mark them as they are not conf files. I remember someone has marked it as %config, or maybe I forget, whatever. 2. Fixed. For issue 3, you can review my spec again: Spec URL: http://cicku.me/dput.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/dput-0.9.6.4-2.fc20.src.rpm Not sure if you are packager now, if you get approved later, please continue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HtL1N5iJeB&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review