https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989960 --- Comment #14 from Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #13) > We're talking past eachother: > > > 1. They can't be missing - they are part of package. > > They _could_ be excluded, _if_ they were marked %doc. Currently, they aren't > marked %doc. That's why I commented on the implications of marking them %doc > when they are [strictly] required at run-time by a Help menu. Ok, in reality they are not _strictly_ required. Now qtdbf can work without them (showing "Help file missing\nNo such file or directory."). But now it's to hard (for devels) to use distro-specific doc path. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eUx56676dL&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review