https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984360 --- Comment #2 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) Note: No javadoc subpackage present See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in joyce See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries - Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: Missing: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in joyce-devel See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RequiringBasePackage - Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java - Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage Note: No javadoc subpackage present See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [!]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Note: See rpmlint output [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "Unknown or generated". 64 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/slaanesh/Documents/fedora/984360-joyce/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 614400 bytes in 9 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Java: [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build Maven: [-]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file Note: Found : Packager: Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. Java: [-]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI Note: joyce subpackage is not noarch. Please verify manually [-]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.) ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 2283520 bytes in /usr/share 2283520 joyce-2.2.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: joyce-2.2.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm joyce-devel-2.2.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm joyce.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Amstrad -> Amsterdam joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskid ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskform ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/xanne ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskutil ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/md3serial ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/apriboot ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskdump ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/xjoyce ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskscan ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dsktrans ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 joyce.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/joyce-2.2.5/COPYING joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskid joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskutil joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dsktrans joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xjoyce joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary md3serial joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xanne joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary apriboot joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskscan joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskform joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskdump joyce-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation joyce-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/cpmredir.h joyce-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/liblink.h joyce-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/765.h 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 20 errors, 12 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint joyce-devel joyce joyce-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation joyce-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/cpmredir.h joyce-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/liblink.h joyce-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/765.h joyce.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Amstrad -> Amsterdam joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskid ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskform ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/xanne ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 /lib64/libpng16.so.16 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 /lib64/libxml2.so.2 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 /lib64/libz.so.1 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 /lib64/libm.so.6 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 /lib64/libdl.so.2 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 /lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0 joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_pwrite joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_xtread joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_open joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_get_psh joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_strerror joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_dirty joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_pseek joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_close joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_creat joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_xread joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_drive_status joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_pformat joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_getgeom joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_psecid joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_pread joyce.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 dsk_xwrite joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 /lib64/libpng16.so.16 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 /lib64/libxml2.so.2 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 /lib64/libz.so.1 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 /lib64/libm.so.6 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 /lib64/libdl.so.2 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 /lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpng16.so.16 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libxml2.so.2 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libz.so.1 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 joyce.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0 joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskutil ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/md3serial ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/apriboot ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskdump ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/xjoyce ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dskscan ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dsktrans ['/usr/lib64'] joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libdsk.so.3.2.4 joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/lib765.so.3.1.2 joyce.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/joyce-2.2.5/COPYING joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 joyce.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/liblink.so.1.0.0 joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskid joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskutil joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dsktrans joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xjoyce joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary md3serial joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xanne joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary apriboot joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskscan joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskform joyce.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dskdump 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 20 errors, 47 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- joyce-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): joyce(x86-64) lib765.so.3()(64bit) libdsk.so.3()(64bit) liblink.so.1()(64bit) joyce (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): lib765.so.3()(64bit) libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libdsk.so.3()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) liblink.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpng16.so.16()(64bit) libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- joyce-devel: joyce-devel joyce-devel(x86-64) joyce: joyce joyce(x86-64) lib765.so.3()(64bit) libdsk.so.3()(64bit) liblink.so.1()(64bit) Source checksums ---------------- http://www.seasip.info/Unix/Joyce/joyce-2.2.5b.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : e3b6b9ba73af49cf8ad21d35f86e88a52e41e98ba5a655ef72481bbe30eec8b7 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e3b6b9ba73af49cf8ad21d35f86e88a52e41e98ba5a655ef72481bbe30eec8b7 Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --mock-config fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 984360 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eme5nGKRTc&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review