Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for zd1211 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 kwizart@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-14 07:45 EST ------- From: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-February/msg00292.html The package shouldn't be concerned by this licence field Redistributable, no modification permitted (since this is a GPL firmware) The question are still: - Does it is usefull to have a -devel package - Do users that uses zd1211rw or zd1211 softmac drivers (already in vanilla) or zd1211-mac80211 (since kernel 2.6.21rc1 and fedora 7 test), are experimenting the same usability as the closed firmware... -> This will lead to write a test procedure Since the compilation result is noarch is it also working if a ppc build of the utility that assemble the firmware is done ? I'm also sponsored (so i removed the FE-NEEDSPONSOR field) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review