https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736861 --- Comment #19 from Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- Created attachment 762010 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=762010&action=edit improvements for spec-file (In reply to Mads Kiilerich from comment #18) > Thank you for the opinion and advice. > > I am still convinced that curses should be a separate package. Installing > hgview-curses can take 7.5 MB on disk including the dependencies. The other way round one can argue about hgview pulling in "half-a-desktop", even if user just needs/wants ncurses interface, e.g. on terminal-only machine. So I though a bit about it and come in with another aproach making both sides happy, I hope. When you have a look at the attached patch, you'll see I changed package-order a bit. There are three pkgs now: hgview (is what was former -common) depending hgview-ui and hgview-{curses,qt} providing hgview-ui, requiring hgview. This results in a) the user can choose which ui to install b) even just installing hgview will install an ui, so we have a working base install. Yum should be smart enough to pull in the "cheaper = less bandwith/disk" ui. What's your opinion to this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YPbCgt5n0z&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review