https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 --- Comment #14 from Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #13) > (In reply to Remi Collet from comment #12) > > Sorry for this coming late. > > > > It will be great to not put headers directly in /usr/include, but in a sub > > directory. > > Hi, > > Can you patch the pecl_http to get it worked? Yes, of course (for now libserf is not used yet by pecl_http, just in the dev tree) > It's OK to install libserf into subdir. But I don't know why take this name > "serf-1"? very probably from library name (libserf-1) pkfconfig file is also serf-1.pc > I know this weird name since packaging it..It's a confusion. Why should we > name it "serf-1", even "serf" is better than that name... Or maybe I'm > wrong. yes, another name could be used. sometime being in sync with other distro, which have this lib for a long time, is a good practice (note, debian have both serf-0 and serf-1) Using a "versionned" directory allow to have 2 major version installed at the same time (if needed). Look in /usr/include, a lot of already exists. > But whatever, should we open a new thread on packaging list? I want > to know others' ideas. I you want > Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LKyyyaU6n8&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review