[Bug 973904] Review Request: libserf - High-Performance Asynchronous HTTP Client Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904

--- Comment #13 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #12)
> Sorry for this coming late.
> 
> It will be great to not put headers directly in /usr/include, but in a sub
> directory.

Hi,

Can you patch the pecl_http to get it worked?

It's OK to install libserf into subdir. But I don't know why take this name
"serf-1"?

I know this weird name since packaging it..It's a confusion. Why should we name
it "serf-1", even "serf" is better than that name... Or maybe I'm wrong. But
whatever, should we open a new thread on packaging list? I want to know others'
ideas.

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OpPjJGf1fV&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]