https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972568 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> --- > The files don't belong in a package called uthash. > Instead, they should go to uthash-devel as per the > packaging guidelines. Which would make sense. Just IMHO, and I recommend that for library-less -devel packages so they are like all other -devel packages. However, kindly refer to bug 798438 comment 9. The FPC finds it acceptable, if library-less development packages (no matter whether they contain only headers or also tools) would not be named -devel but used the base package for including their files. As such, building just uthash.noarch from uthash.src.rpm would be okay, although enough packagers would prefer the uthash-devel.noarch style. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lUcIvyL7DN&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review