https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261 --- Comment #8 from Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #7) > I do not understand your comment about that the BRs should not be arched. > For arched packages having arched BRs is preferred. Having these BRs from a > different architecture is not sufficient for the package to build. As far as my sponsor taught me: BRs must not be arched, because they will become the Requires of the srpm and may cause the srpm not to build (created on x86_64 and build on i686) or may pull the wrong arch during build on multi-arch (created on i686 and build on x86_64). On Koji this won't be an issue, but... Having arched-Requires is prefered, afaik. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HbtHrmmUyi&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review