Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746 ------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-12 07:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Advantage? Avoid conflicts. I very much prefer yum install to "yum install X; > oh, wait... conflict ? why, oh why ?" > I really have in mind the ethereal package, where the GUI and text-only versions > did not conflict. Maybe then use "Provides: ettercap" in ettercap-gtk, so that when one runs "yum install ettercap ettercap-gtk ettercap-common" only the ettercap-gtk and the ettercap-comman package are installed? Or when the ettercap package is already installed and one runs "yum install ettercap-gtk" the ettercap is deinstalled and ettercap-gtk is installed. Maybe Conflicts is not the correct rpm Tag. But the described beheaviour would be my favourite. If this is not possible with RPM-Tags, than using alternatives would be the best. > WRT to comment #7 and #9: > only one. However, I think that splitting in three is a better choice Three packages is what I want to suggest, too. ettercap package: Requires: ettercap-common %{_bindir}/ettercap (without support for gtk) %{_bindir}/ettercap-text (symlink to ettercap) %{_bindir}/ettercap-curses (symlink to ettercap) ettercap-gtk package: Requires: ettercap-common %{_bindir}/ettercap (with support for gtk) %{_bindir}/ettercap-text (symlink to ettercap) %{_bindir}/ettercap-curses (symlink to ettercap) %{_bindir}/ettercap-gtk (symlink to ettercap) ettercap-common package: Everything else. (In reply to comment #13) > If there is a text-only subpackage that doesn't need any X library > it may be installed in a very minimal setup. This is the advantage of building different binaries and package them differently. But not a advantage of avoiding conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review