Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-12 06:42 EST ------- Advantage? Avoid conflicts. I very much prefer yum install to "yum install X; oh, wait... conflict ? why, oh why ?" I really have in mind the ethereal package, where the GUI and text-only versions did not conflict. As for help, I was thinking of the man pages only. WRT to comment #7 and #9: As far as I understand the setup (correct me if I am wrong) says "text only binary in ettercap and gtk version + the rest in ettercap-common". This would leave ettercap-common as the only package needed for graphic only installs. I find the name a bit strange and not very explanatory. I would rather suggest "ettercap" for the GUI version and "ettercap-tui" or "tettercap" for the text only one. However, I think that splitting in three is a better choice - text only rpm, including %{_bindir}/ettercap (+ Requires + ncurses) + man pages if they are different to the GUI - GUI, including %{_bindir}/ettercap-gtk + .desktop + scriptlets + Requires for GUI + man pages if different to the text only - common: the rest -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review