Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961141 --- Comment #5 from Oron Peled <oron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/debhelper.spec SRPM URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/debhelper-9.20120909-1.fc18.src.rpm for comment #3 * The duplicate file revealed a far bigger issue -- find_lang --with-man only handle single man-page -- replaced with modified logic in our .spec * Updated one $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot} so .spec is consistent * Updated changelog to have consistent version * About "dpkg-devel": - Yes it is needed. It contains all the tools used by the debhelper wrappers like deb-substvars, deb-shlibs, etc. - The dpkg RPM split mirror the Debian package split -- I think w should stay that way. - Is there a standard way to declare -- "this is an rpmlint exception?" for comment #4 * No. The new version belongs to Debian/sid (unstable) * Meanwhile, all my RR are synchonized with Debian/wheezy (the new stable) * On the long run, I think Debian/testing is a better fit for Fedora life-cycle. However, I think we should leave it for now: - Current Debian/jessie (new testing) has just been unfrozen, so not much of a difference. - If someone want to support EPEL, than Debian/stable may be a better starting point. Also: * We still need the new dpkg (rhbz#648384) * And I'm in the process of pushing po-debconf * So maybe we should wait for few days for a final test -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QDmFmFX13d&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review