Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951820 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Note that the guidelines says "if present", iow the Requires on the > main package (or other sub-packages) should be fully-versioned if > such a requires is present. I fear that's not the case, and the "if present" refers to whether subpackages exist. It's just a poorly worded text for a generic check in fedora-review, which treats the fully-versioned dep as a "MUST" and only excludes -debuginfo subpackages. There are other exceptions, however: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package Documentation packages really need not depend on base packages. In this case, it's even a Development Documentation package that doesn't extend the base package (but is for the -devel subpackage). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=f8H794ZyfE&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review