Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905255 --- Comment #38 from Ravindra Kumar <ravindrakumar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > I have sponsored Ravindra Kumar into the packager group. Thanks Richard. > Sorry, it was a leftover from another spec file from which I did copy the text. > It will probably be needed at rhel 7 release time to make the upgrade from > RHEL 6 (SysV) to the RHEL 7 (systemd) package. > I will add it to the RHEL 6 branch when it will be time. Sure. > Well, I would prefer that a text file goes along with the package, I think it > would be better to leave that in. How about fixing it in the README file from open-vm-tools source? That way it will stay more accurate. > Yes, but please add api docs only to the devel subpackage and not in a separate > help subpackage. Sure. I'm keeping most of your changes. I was not right --docdir is not causing double packaging of help, it seems to be something else. I'm still trying to figure it out. > I've created the FESco ticket for the boot enabled service. Thanks for creating this ticket. > I've discovered a bug in RHEL 6 official packaging, referencing it here. It > prevents building by using "procps-devel". In your bug, you have mentioned that you are able to work around it using yum. Is that so? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VY1672mUaL&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review