Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923564 --- Comment #8 from Dan Fruehauf <malkodan@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Eduardo, Seems almost like I manage to get one step forward and three steps back :) - Fixed changelog in spec file, including only changes to spec (packaging wise) - Building RPM with .gz and not .xz - Verified the github URL is valid (https://github.com/danfruehauf/NetworkManager-ssh/archive/8767415030da697a1a08cb536166c0ca7bb037b2/NetworkManager-ssh-0.0.3-8767415.tar.gz) - Remove scriptlets - If there's nothing in %post and $postun, should the sections exist anyway? - %{checkout} is defined by hand and conforming what I could understand in the URL you've provided - I've changed the %{checkout} tag to conform the standards, although it's not 100% clear. An example in that file would make things heaps clearer... - What is exactly %{alphatag}? Is it defined at all? %{X}? - Currently I have 'Release: 2.%{checkout}%{?dist}' - Release (2, or %{X}) is separated by a comma from %{checkout} - %{checkout} is 20130322git%{shortcommit} - much like '20110102git9e88d7e' in the URL - But I'm not using epoch anyway anymore anywhere! No versioned dependencies I've posted a new .spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://nm-ssh.cloudapp.net/NetworkManager-ssh.spec SRPM URL: http://nm-ssh.cloudapp.net/NetworkManager-ssh-0.0.3-2.20130322git8767415.fc18.src.rpm I really hope we're making some sort of progress, I'm really trying my best as you can see... :) Many thanks, Dan. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pvjudxU81j&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review