[Bug 919469] Review request: mate-applet-softupd - MATE Software Update Applet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919469

Assen Totin <assen@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |assen@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #10 from Assen Totin <assen@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Wolfgang, Patrick, 

Thanks for your help on this package. I did not expect it to cause such a large
discussion. 

Let me explain briefly: 

1. The spec file in my source tarball: in all my sources I always add a spec
file. It is designed to be as generic as possible and will likely fail any
check for compliance with strict distribution rules - like Fedora's. It is
mostly for my usage, because I try to provide generic RPMs whenever feasible
(my software usually has only few dependencies, not hard to track). 

To be able to quickly build RPMs for different architectures (and use cases), I
prefer to build the RPM file in-tree using the Makefile with 'make rpm';
therefore, my spec files usually have "%setup" and "./configure" commented out
- my usual workflow is to run ./configure wth proper parameters (even if it is
cross-compile), then "make" and "make rpm". I know that there are (and I have
used) dedicetdd tols like mock, but still I find it easier and quicker to buil
RPMs in-tree.

I can't tell whether Patrick should patch my RPM file or keep an entirely new
one; to me, Fedora seems too cutting-edge in terms of spec files (e.g., I don't
want to lose, in general, the ability to build on/for RHEL - or cut off things
which will work on other RPM-based distros), so I guess it is better for the
package maintainer to decide. 

2. The patch: when I released 0.2.5, one of the descriptions in French, sent me
by Patrick, was missing. This is fixed in my trunk along with the configure.ac.
I can tag and send you a 0.2.6 tarball right away, if this will make it easier
for you. Otherwise, youcan apply the patch as it is written by Patrick.

WWell,

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gF9jt67FwM&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]