Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920447 --- Comment #2 from Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/jasmine-node/marked.spec SRPM URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/jasmine-node/SRPMS/marked-0.2.8-2.fc18.src.rpm > - %check is present and all tests pass. > > There appear to be four test failures, but failure of those tests is > not actually produce a non-zero exit status so rpmbuild does not abort. I dug around a bit and turns out 1 of the failures is "meant" to fail, one of the failures is known to fail but not yet fixed, and the other two "unknown" tests I'm not sure about. Comments added to the spec: # gfm_break test will always fail due to author's choice not to include gfm # line breaks: https://github.com/chjj/marked/issues/49 # gfm_code_hr_list test is known to fail but the author has not yet arrived # at a satisfactory solution: https://github.com/chjj/marked/pull/118 # def_blocks and double_link tests also fail and author has been queried # about whether these are meant to fail or not: # https://github.com/chjj/marked/issues/136 I've tried building the latest revision instead and the 2 "unknown" tests still fail. I'm really not familiar enough with marked to make a comment on whether it will cause problems for users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VqVgz6Mtd6&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review