Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-02-26 16:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #54) > I fail to comprehend how aggregating within a tarball would be bad, while > aggregating within an ISO file (as Fedora does today) would be acceptable. Because the tarball is what demarcate what is a given software. > I think that if we actually keep a package out of Fedora because of crazy > interpretations such as this then we truly have lost the plot. I am not saying that we should do that, the 2 programs here are clearly distinct (I mean, js code and ntop are distinct programs) so mere aggregation may be the right interpretation. If I recall well, debian people consider that files in the same tarball or package should have compatible licenses, but we are not forced to do the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review