Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2200-firmware - Firmware for Intel® PRO/Wireless 2200 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217351 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx 2007-02-26 12:02 EST ------- My strongish opinion is that all firmware packages should be falled $foo-firmware, no matter what the upstream distributables are named (with additional case by case Provides: if they're seen useful). And this is not only about ipw2100/ipw2200/ipw3945 - there are already at least at76_usb-firmware, zd1211-firmware, and alsa-firmware being submitted/reviewed; having a tech-jargon-1337-speak-oddball foo-ucode in the mix for just one package would sound silly to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review