Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2200-firmware - Firmware for Intel® PRO/Wireless 2200 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217351 ------- Additional Comments From matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-26 11:50 EST ------- http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/ipw2200-firmware/ipw2200-firmware-3.0-7.src.rpm http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/ipw2200-firmware/ipw2200-firmware.spec * Mon Feb 26 2007 Matthias Saou <http://freshrpms.net> 3.0-7 - Move from a symlink to using a copy for the LICENSE (cleaner and easier). I've got one last doubt : Is the name of the package OK? I recall naming it like this to have it as explicit as possible, ("firmware" instead of plain "fw"), but now that the latest 3945 cousin is a "microcode", with the package/file called "ucode", I'm not sure what do do... 1) Use "fw" for ipw2100/ipw2200 and "ucode" for ipw3945 2) Keep "firmware" for ipw2100/ipw2200 and use "microcode" for ipw3945 3) Keep "firmware" for ipw2100/ipw2200 and use "ucode" for ipw3945 (my choice) 4) Keep "firmware" for ipw2100/ipw2200 and also use it for ipw3945 ...maybe this should be raised on the packagers mailing-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review