Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843 --- Comment #6 from Al Stone <ahs3@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Hi Al. > > > > >NB: this package does work on x86_64; it may or may not work properly on > > >i386 or ARM. Part of getting this package into Fedora is to provide for such > > >additional testing and/or porting as needed. > > > > About this, > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Support > > I misspoke :(. And I had a silly bug in the testing script that I had not > seen. > > x86 and x86_64 work: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4906710 > > ARM works: https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1401630 > > PPC, sparc and s390 should also build properly (I am currently correcting the > build errors). > > At the same time, I had read that part of the guidelines, but it was unclear > to me how that applied to brand new packages. It seemed sort of odd to file > bugs for something that does not build when the package wasn't in the archive > yet. I'll post a -2 version once I verify the PPC, sparc and s390 fixes. Further investigation on my part has me convinced that ExcludeArch is still the proper way to go. Neither PPC, Sparc or s390 (of any flavor) provide or support ACPI in any meaningful way. It's just simply not the way these systems work on boot. Therefore, providing support for them in this package is essentially meaningless; you wouldn't be able to use any of the results produced. The package has been modified accordingly (with an explanation added) and will be in the -2 version to be posted later today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MuxrZvDYIm&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review