[Bug 891461] Review Request: phantomjs - Headless WebKit with a JavaScript API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891461

--- Comment #12 from Dan Callaghan <dcallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I'm still curious on how to solve remote debugging, web font, JavaScript
> stack trace, while still using a system-installed Qt. Are you going to have
> a different version of Qt package for this?
> 
> Also, the headless feature of PhantomJS is quite popular for CI system. Are
> you going to skip this as well?

I can't ship a fork of Qt and QtWebKit in Fedora just for PhantomJS. If the Qt
patches that PhantomJS is relying on have been accepted and applied upstream,
and if they backport to 4.8 without breaking ABI/API, then I can request the
maintainer of qt (or qtwebkit) apply them in the Fedora package.

Otherwise, the only choices are to:
- find a way to implement the feature in PhantomJS against stock Qt (I am still
hoping to do this for file uploads, since I really need those);
- leave the feature patched out, and include a README.Fedora file explaining
the limitations of the packaged version (I am afraid I might have to do this
for stack traces and headless support); or
- stall this review until such time as PhantomJS works against stock Qt
(perhaps when Qt5 is released?)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=d1uGAh3U29&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]