[Bug 860249] Review Request: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts - A set of mono-spaced OpenType fonts designed for coding environments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249

--- Comment #39 from Tobias Florek <me@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(i really like repo-font-audit's use of unicode)

the following is a commented copy of every warning that repo-font-audit
reports.


— Warning: bad font naming

  Source Code Pro, Semibold → Source Code Pro, DemiBold
    SourceCodePro-Semibold.otf    [adobe-source-code-pro-fonts]

i don't know what to do here. the explanation says that i should add a
fontconfig rule and try to fix it upstream.


— Warning: fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks
  [adobe-source-code-pro-fonts](7)
  ⇒ 7 file(s) (0.596004 MiB) in 1 package(s) (0.263145 MiB) generated from 1
source
  package(s).

— Suggestion: fonts with partial script coverage
  [adobe-source-code-pro-fonts](7)
  ⇒ 7 file(s) (0.596004 MiB) in 1 package(s) (0.263145 MiB) generated from 1
source
  package(s).

— Suggestion: fonts with partial unicode block coverage
  [adobe-source-code-pro-fonts](7)
  ⇒ 7 file(s) (0.596004 MiB) in 1 package(s) (0.263145 MiB) generated from 1
source
  package(s).

should i raise this upstream? i'm sure they know about unicode coverage and i
don't expect they will fix the fontlint's sanity checks without a
human-noticable report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H55Ye92OZ3&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]