Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra - A key/value pair database to store software configurations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209906 kwizart@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-20 17:22 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/elektra/elektra-0.6.4-3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPECS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/elektra/elektra.spec Summary: A key/value pair database to store software configurations rpmlint errors on source and binaries E: elektra sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/elektra-elektraenv.sh E: elektra executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/elektra-elektraenv.sh 0755 W: elektra-static no-documentation W: elektra-static-devel no-documentation About the source script error: the /etc/profiles.d/ directory i have do not contain any file (which are sh or csh - so executable by definition) which do not have executable bit set... (if you have some example i will check) I've checked for examples in glib2 or krb5 but non of theses file remove it... they do not use %config for one or %config(noreplace) for the other. I think this file isn't aimed to be checked by used to define their environnement but use the environnement that conform to the package version... (i will check by use) Anyway The packaging guideline should state about this question... I plan to release cinepaint which requires oyranos which requires elektra (do you know kafka?!) So hope it will help to do so. I will use it as a base for oyranos packaging i also hope it will help to solve differents question open here and to know how to fix them by the examples... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review