Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887913 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #4) > I have a question about full versioning clipper (polyclipping) dependency. > Math::Clipper version 1.16 comes with clipper 4.10.0. Should I require > exactly this version of polyclipping-devel and libpolyclipping.so.3? I do not need to specify run-time dependency on libpolyclipping.so.3. It should get discovered by rpmbuild automatically. You need to build-require specific version of polyclipping-devel only if it's required due to incompatibilities. I think it's not necessary in this case as the polyclipping does not change ABI frequently. However I would recommend to build-require minimal version equalled to bundled version because users can imply Clipper version from Math::Clipper. I.e. polyclipping-devel >= 4.10.0 for this perl-Clipper-Math release. > If so, should I modify the spec for F17 and F18, as they are using older > versions, to use older version of this Perl module too? > You should be consistent across Fedora releases, thus if you decide to tie the two versions, you should either not package Perl module into older Fedoras, or upgrade polyclipping, or package older Perl modules. That's up to you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x6MyG3mTLF&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review