Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890491 --- Comment #2 from Steven Roberts <strobert@xxxxxxxxxx> --- What I get for trying to squeeze this in before I went to bed last night :). Obviously was a bit too tired. The wrong version got sync'd up which addresses some of the items... I was fighting my local fedora dev env last night (mock stopped working after latest updates) so was shuffling files around. - I'll drop the requires. Thought I had. - EPEL5 is a planned target. we have been using a local generated rpm for a bit know, but thinking getting it upstream would be a good thing. - that description is straight from the perl module's author when describing his module. I'll reqord it a bit to make a bit more sense as a package description. - %{__perl} is what cpanspec spits out and what the MODEUL_COMPAT define listed uses at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl?rd=Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT_Requires so got the impression that was normal best practice. - I'll have to see where cpanspec grabbed the extra spec files from. that is really weird. I'm actually working with the cpanspec author at the moment on a new release so sounds like a bug to get fixed :) - thank you for the pointer to the %perl_default_filter. the link to it (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Perl) from the perl packaging page is a little hidden. I'll see about tweaking the wiki pages to point it out more. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cJ85opJ0S3&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review