[Bug 888301] Review Request: orthanc - RESTful DICOM server for healthcare and medical research

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888301

--- Comment #9 from Mario Ceresa <mrceresa@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Oops mid-air collision!! :)

Hi again, some miscellaneous findings before a more through review:

* There are at least two licenses: MIT (OrthancCppClient) and GPLv3. This
should be reflected in the SPEC file as in:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios

* Core/SQlite contains an sqlite wrapper from chrome. Is it under BSD license.
I see there are some modifications specifically made for Orthanc, which could
qualify as a fork. Sebastian, in order to understand if this is the case, would
you mind to comment (briefly) on these questions
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Standard_questions)?

* No need to bundle jsoncpp, it is currently in review here: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882617

* I see a lot of cmake files that deal with 3rd part libraries. If you don't
use them, why don't you "rm -rf" them in the %prep section? Just to be sure we
are not using them?

Please comment on these issues and I'll continue with the review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NK75PZh3KT&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]