Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226188 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-19 16:19 EST ------- OK, seems this has been fixed by using a linker script instead of a symlink. Looks like a -static subpackage popped up since I first looked at this; I think this is one of those packages that warrants the availability of static libs so I have no complaints. I've done a fresh build on my buildsys, which gives me more information than what was available to us at fudcon. Here's the current set of rpmlint complaints: W: ncurses unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmenuw.so.5.6 /lib64/libdl.so.2 W: ncurses unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libpanel.so.5.6 /lib64/libdl.so.2 W: ncurses unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libform.so.5.6 /lib64/libdl.so.2 W: ncurses unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libformw.so.5.6 /lib64/libdl.so.2 W: ncurses unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5.6 /lib64/libdl.so.2 W: ncurses unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmenu.so.5.6 /lib64/libdl.so.2 These will only show up if you run rpmlint on the installed package. I think they show up because the configure script sticks "-ldl" on the link line for whatever reason. E: ncurses-static devel-dependency ncurses-devel W: ncurses-static no-documentation W: ncurses-static devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libncursesw.a W: ncurses-static devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libmenuw_g.a [and several more identical warnings] These are all OK. I have to run now; I'll finish this a bit later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review