Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228555 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-14 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > W: fedora-ds invalid-license GPL plus extensions > W: fedora-ds-devel invalid-license GPL plus extensions > W: fedora-ds-debuginfo invalid-license GPL plus extensions > W: fedora-ds invalid-license GPL plus extensions > > Perhaps should use just GPL as the license tag? I don't want to give people the impression that the license is just plain old GPL. The extension is important for those people who want to write and distribute plugins with the directory server. So if there is some other way to indicate that, I'm open to suggestions. > * %check is not present; There is no test code in the districution. We're still working on that, being able to open source our test suites. Is it necessary to have something for %check? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review