Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228555 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-14 11:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > * Release should be 0.1.%{cvsdate}%{?dist} > > > Guidelines dont mention where the disttag should go in this case. I think its > fine as is. The current release tag of 0.1.%{?dist}%{?cvsdate} will expand to 0.1..fc720070213 if build in the Extras buildsystem, since the expansion of %{?dist} includes a leading dot. The DistTag page (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag), which is referenced from the package naming guidelines page (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) says: "Basically, follow the Packaging/NamingGuidelines for how to set the value for Release, then append %{?dist} to the end." So I think that the guidelines do say where to put the dist tag and Comment #5 is right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review