[Bug 858381] Review Request: jogl2 - Java bindings for the OpenGL API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381

--- Comment #15 from Clément DAVID <c.david86@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi gil,

I update the spec and srpm file to fix the %{?dist} issue.

Issues:
=======

> [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
>      in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
>      for the package is included in %doc.
>      Note: Cannot find licenses in rpm(s)
> See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

LICENSE.txt is present as %doc in the main package and sub-packages

> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
>      found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
> See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames

A comment is present which clarify this thing accordingly to the guidelines.

> [!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
>      Note: Source0 (jogl-v2.0-rc10.tar.7z)

Renamed to provide both jogl and jogl2 packages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]