https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863985 --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria <echevemaster@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi again Mathieu: Midori suffers from the same problem with the waf version in fedora (not build the package), therefore uses the executable of waf included, but the question is, it's easy for you maintain change in wscript through time with successive versions of waf?, if the answer is positive, use the version of waf in fedora, if not, I see no problem as there is a precedent, So be should documented in the spec if you use the binary included Btw, You searched if there are manual pages for this program? For the readers: - Download http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/midori/0.4.7/1.fc18/src/midori-0.4.7-1.fc18.src.rpm - Extract the spec with rpm2cpio midori-0.4.7-1.fc18.src.rpm | cpio -idmv - Open midori.spec Verify this %build export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" ## Currently does not build against Fedora waf ./waf --prefix=%{_usr} \ --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} \ --libdir=%{_libdir} \ --enable-apidocs \ configure ./waf %{?_smp_mflags} build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review