https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863985 --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Mathieu: > Initial Comments: > waf is available in fedora > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5794 > Please Remove the waf binary on the source, and add waf on BuildRequires Is that an absolute requirement? I'd like to avoid diverging too much from upstream on this. The waf version in Fedora is much more recent, I'd have to almost rewrite the wscript (I actually did it at first, before reverting and submitting the package using the bundled waf). I couldn't find anything in the Packaging Guidelines about this, the only reference I found was this email: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-February/msg00038.html But that doesn't seem to be conclusive on whether or not the system waf must be used. So to sum it up, I'll do it if it becomes a review requirement, but I'd like to avoid it if possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review