https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769958 Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx | |m --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4567138 $ rpmlint -i -v * eqp.src: I: checking eqp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) prover -> prove, rover, proverb The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) equational -> equalization, equation, equitation The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US equational -> equalization, equation, equitation The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US prover -> prove, rover, proverb The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US usr -> use, us, user The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US robbins -> ribbons, Robbins, robins The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.src: I: checking-url http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/eqp/ (timeout 10 seconds) eqp.src: I: checking-url http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/old-ftp/eqp-09e.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) eqp.i686: I: checking eqp.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) prover -> prove, rover, proverb The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) equational -> equalization, equation, equitation The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US equational -> equalization, equation, equitation The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US prover -> prove, rover, proverb The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.i686: I: checking-url http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/eqp/ (timeout 10 seconds) eqp.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary eqp Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. eqp.x86_64: I: checking eqp.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) prover -> prove, rover, proverb The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) equational -> equalization, equation, equitation The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US equational -> equalization, equation, equitation The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US prover -> prove, rover, proverb The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. eqp.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/eqp/ (timeout 10 seconds) eqp.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary eqp Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. eqp-debuginfo.i686: I: checking eqp-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/eqp/ (timeout 10 seconds) eqp-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking eqp-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/eqp/ (timeout 10 seconds) eqp.spec: I: checking-url http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/old-ftp/eqp-09e.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings. No recognizable issues from rpmlint. Still one objection: The %defattr line is obsolete, even for EPEL 5. Please remove. However, under normal circumstances I would assign this review request to me and do a full review. But what's the current state of the licensing issue? Is it safe now to accept the current license declaration as is, or does it need some further action? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review