https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 --- Comment #2 from František Dvořák <valtri@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > > Adding manual pages or extra documentation is probably not up to you, that's > why ignorable. The wrong FSF address should be reported to the upstream > developers, but no further action is needed from your side. > OK. > The %defattr line is obsolete, even for EPEL 5. I assume there will be such > a package, in view of BuildRoot, %clean and so on. > %defattr removed. > The summary and description for the -devel package are incorrect. There are > no static files at all, and if this would be the case, they would have to go > into a -static subpackage anyway. And we have no development documentation > in the -devel package. > Description corrected. > What about the log4c-config script in -devel? Shouldn't this go into the > base package? No, I think it should be in the -devel. The -config file is used to get compilation flags for development with log4c and it is better not to install it without the log4c-devel package. New URLs: Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/log4c-1.2.2-1b/log4c.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/log4c-1.2.2-1b/log4c-1.2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4564782 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review